Consensus Agreement Implementation
Consensus models vary from three to ten levels, but all address the same fundamental issues. Here we will describe an eight-step process, but processes with fewer steps are similar; they only combine certain steps for you. 10. Note the “Genesis” in the agreement or appendices. Understanding how and why the different provisions were adopted by participants can help reduce or eliminate differences of interpretation during implementation. The consensus aims to improve long-term solidarity. As a result, it should not be confused with unanimity in the immediate situation, which is often a symptom of groupthing. Studies of an effective consensus process generally indicate a rejection of unanimity or the “illusion of unanimity”, which does not hold up when a group is under real pressure (when dissent reappears). Cory Doctorow, Ralph Nader and other proponents of deliberative democracy or justice-like methods see explicit dissent as a symbol of strength.
Remember that consensus is about finding solutions that work for everyone. Make sure you don`t get carried away, because most people like the proposal. Watch out for people who look calm or unhappy, and check them out. Bill Leach understood the need for buyout at all levels of staff and the continued commitment of an agency to implement the terms of a consensus agreement. His presentation made an essential contribution by bringing these themes together in a key and often overlooked principle of consensus-building. As difficult as problems are in practice, it is important that they become standard considerations in structuring a collaborative public policy process. 8) Approval of the agreement: the negotiators then bring the agreement back to their constituencies and try to get it approved. This is one of the most difficult steps, as constituencies have not been involved in the ongoing process and have often not developed the level of understanding or confidence necessary to see why this is the best possible agreement they can reach. Negotiators must be able to explain precisely why the regulation was designed as it was and why it is advantageous for voters to approve it. If one of the groups represented in the consensus process does not agree at this stage, it is likely that they will refuse to sign the agreement and that the agreement may well disintegrate. It is possible that stakeholders can assist each other in developing strategies to convince their respective electoral groups of the value of the agreement. In any case, it is important that the voters of the stakeholders understand the compromises that have been made.
If they don`t, it`s likely that one day the deal will be broken on the street. It is also important that stakeholders receive support from those responsible for implementing the agreement, often from government authorities. It is often argued that consensus works well in small groups, but when groups become larger and more diverse, it is simply impossible to find solutions that work for everyone. It is true that it becomes much more difficult to find consensus if there are more people and more perspectives. However, consensus can be successfully used by larger groups, the chapter on consensus in large groups for case studies and proposals on how it can work. Many activists, such as anarchists and others who work for peace, the environment and social justice, see consensus as essential to their work. They believe that methods of change must meet their goals and visions of a free, non-violent, egalitarian society. Many mass actions and protest camps, which involved thousands of people, were organized and carried out by consensus, including the World Trade Organization`s “Battle of Seattle” protest in 1999, the G8 summit in 2005 in Scotland, and the Camps for Climate Action in Britain, Germany, and Australia. .